Rodriguez, Gerardo v. Texas, the State Of

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 17, 2018
Docket04-85-00094-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rodriguez, Gerardo v. Texas, the State Of (Rodriguez, Gerardo v. Texas, the State Of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez, Gerardo v. Texas, the State Of, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 17, 2018

No. 04-85-00094-CR

Gerardo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 5388 Honorable Peter Michael Curry, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting a copy of his trial transcripts for purposes of filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. This court has no jurisdiction over post- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Post- conviction writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained, and made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In order to obtain a free copy of the record, appellant would need to file a motion in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained and demonstrate that his claim is not frivolous and that the record is needed to decide the issues presented. See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 326 (1976); Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). Appellant’s motion is DENIED without prejudice to seeking relief in the proper court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of October, 2018. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. MacCollom
426 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1976)
In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Escobar v. State
880 S.W.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodriguez, Gerardo v. Texas, the State Of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-gerardo-v-texas-the-state-of-texapp-2018.