Rodriguez, Ex Parte Alberto

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 2004
DocketAP-74,932
StatusPublished

This text of Rodriguez, Ex Parte Alberto (Rodriguez, Ex Parte Alberto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez, Ex Parte Alberto, (Tex. 2004).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. 74,932
EX PARTE ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of the felony offense of murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Applicant appealed, and his conviction was affirmed. Alberto Rodriguez v. State of Texas, No. 14-95-01488-CR (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th], delivered April 30, 1998).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied an opportunity to file a petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely notify him that his conviction had been affirmed or that he could seek discretionary review, pro se. The trial court found, based on an affidavit filed by Applicant's appellate counsel, that counsel did not inform Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed until after the time for filing a petition for discretionary review had expired.

Habeas corpus relief is granted, in part, and Applicant is granted leave to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review from his conviction in cause number 700071-A from the 178th Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant is ordered returned to the point at which he can file a meaningful petition for discretionary review. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days of the date the mandate of this Court has issued.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



DELIVERED: April 7, 2004

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodriguez, Ex Parte Alberto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-ex-parte-alberto-texcrimapp-2004.