Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State

DecidedJune 20, 2002

Docket13-99-00628-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State (Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-99-628-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

ESTEBAN CARRILLO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 103rd District Court

of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ESTEBAN CARRILLO RODRIGUEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 99-CR-319-D.

Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the notice of appeal in this matter did not comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to properly perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20^th day of June, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-99-628-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

ESTEBAN CARRILLO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 103rd District Court

of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ESTEBAN CARRILLO RODRIGUEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 99-CR-319-D.

Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the notice of appeal in this matter did not comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to properly perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20^th day of June, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rodriguez, Esteban Carrillo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-esteban-carrillo-v-state-texapp-2002.