Rodriguez-Diaz v. Norman

629 So. 2d 1001, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12687
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 1993
DocketNos. 93-1160, 93-1437
StatusPublished

This text of 629 So. 2d 1001 (Rodriguez-Diaz v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Norman, 629 So. 2d 1001, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly entered a final summary judgment on appellant’s claim for defamation where it was not brought within two years of the publication of the defamatory statement. Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Erikson & Kupfer, P.A. v. Flanagan, 629 So.2d 113 (Fla.1993). Where no abuse of discretion appears, we will not disturb the ruling of the trial court denying the motion to dissolve the injunction. United States Mfg. & Galvanizing Corp. v. Renfrow, 592 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

US Mfg. and Galvanizing Corp. v. Renfrow
592 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 So. 2d 1001, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-diaz-v-norman-fladistctapp-1993.