Home/Third Circuit/Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)

Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)

998 F.2d 1004
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1993
Docket92-7629
StatusPublished

This text of 998 F.2d 1004 (Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases), 998 F.2d 1004 (3d Cir. 1993).

Opinion

998 F.2d 1004

Rodriguez (Arturo)
v.
City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy
(George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon
(Robert) (Two Cases)

NOS. 92-7629, 92-7653

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 30, 1993

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,

Kosik, J.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
998 F.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-arturo-v-city-of-scranton-connors-james--ca3-1993.