Home/Third Circuit/Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)

Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)

998 F.2d 1004
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 30, 1993·No. 92-7629·Published

Opinion

998 F.2d 1004

Rodriguez (Arturo)
v.
City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy
(George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon
(Robert) (Two Cases)

NOS. 92-7629, 92-7653

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 30, 1993

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,

Kosik, J.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases), 998 F.2d 1004 (3d Cir. 1993).

998 F.2d 1004 (Rodriguez (Arturo) v. City of Scranton, Connors (James), Klee (James), Murphy (George), Battle (James), McGowan (Ronald), McKeon (Robert) (Two Cases)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.