Rodrigues v. Cassiano
844 So. 2d 778, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7035, 2003 WL 21076675
This text of 844 So. 2d 778 (Rodrigues v. Cassiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rodrigues v. Cassiano, 844 So. 2d 778, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7035, 2003 WL 21076675 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Mangus v. Present, 135 So.2d 417, 419 (Fla.1961)(either a benefit or advantage to the promisor, or detriment or inconvenience to the promisee, is legal consideration for a contract); 11 Fla. Jur 2d Contracts § 88, Benefit or Detriment (2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mangus v. Present
135 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
844 So. 2d 778, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7035, 2003 WL 21076675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodrigues-v-cassiano-fladistctapp-2003.