Rodrigue v. Fronty

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Rodrigue v. Fronty

4 S.C.L. 31

DecidedJanuary 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.C.L. 31 (Rodrigue v. Fronty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodrigue v. Fronty, 4 S.C.L. 31 (S.C. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The court,

Grimke, Bay, Trezevant, Brevard, and Wilds,-jU6jjceS-

Were all clearly of opinion that the plaintiff was intitled to' a new trial. That the law is now settled that a 6are acknowledg. ment of an existing debt, without any evidence of a promise to pay,will lake it out of the statute of limitations. See 1 Esp. Rep. 435. See Wallace’s Rep. 66. Cowan v. Magauran. See the case of Aiken v. Benton, 3d vol. 289.

New trial granted.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court,

Grimke, Bay, Trezevant, Brevard, and Wilds,-jU6jjceS-

Were all clearly of opinion that the plaintiff was intitled to' a new trial. That the law is now settled that a 6are acknowledg. ment of an existing debt, without any evidence of a promise to pay,will lake it out of the statute of limitations. See 1 Esp. Rep. 435. See Wallace’s Rep. 66. Cowan v. Magauran. See the case of Aiken v. Benton, 3d vol. 289.

New trial granted.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.C.L. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodrigue-v-fronty-sc-1806.