Rodrigue v. Fronty

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Rodrigue v. Fronty

4 S.C.L. 31

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

The court,

Grimke, Bay, Trezevant, Brevard, and Wilds,-jU6jjceS-

Were all clearly of opinion that the plaintiff was intitled to' a new trial. That the law is now settled that a 6are acknowledg. ment of an existing debt, without any evidence of a promise to pay,will lake it out of the statute of limitations. See 1 Esp. Rep. 435. See Wallace’s Rep. 66. Cowan v. Magauran. See the case of Aiken v. Benton, 3d vol. 289.

New trial granted.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court,

Grimke, Bay, Trezevant, Brevard, and Wilds,-jU6jjceS-

Were all clearly of opinion that the plaintiff was intitled to' a new trial. That the law is now settled that a 6are acknowledg. ment of an existing debt, without any evidence of a promise to pay,will lake it out of the statute of limitations. See 1 Esp. Rep. 435. See Wallace’s Rep. 66. Cowan v. Magauran. See the case of Aiken v. Benton, 3d vol. 289.

New trial granted.-

Rodrigue v. Fronty, 4 S.C.L. 31 (S.C. 1806).

Pincite

4 S.C.L. 31 (Rodrigue v. Fronty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.