Rodrigue v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rodrigue v. Copeland

444 So. 2d 128, 1984 La. LEXIS 8055

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodrigue v. Copeland. Read the opinion of the Court — 475 So. 2d 1071 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 16, 1984·No. No. 83-CC-2642·Published

Opinion

In re Herbert Rodrigue, Burton G. Klein, and Mary Borrell, applying for supervisory writs to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 83-C-855, 24th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, No. 389-098, C/W 289-142.

Denied. The matter is not moot, and as the Court of Appeal points out, plaintiff may proceed to trial on the merits for a permanent injunction.

WATSON, J., would simply deny the writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Herbert Rodrigue, Burton G. Klein, and Mary Borrell, applying for supervisory writs to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 83-C-855, 24th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, No. 389-098, C/W 289-142.

Denied. The matter is not moot, and as the Court of Appeal points out, plaintiff may proceed to trial on the merits for a permanent injunction.

WATSON, J., would simply deny the writ application.

Rodrigue v. Copeland, 444 So. 2d 128, 1984 La. LEXIS 8055 (La. 1984).

Pincite

444 So. 2d 128 (Rodrigue v. Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.