Rodrick Oneall Taylor v. State
This text of Rodrick Oneall Taylor v. State (Rodrick Oneall Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 14, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00671-CR
RODRICK ONEALL TAYLOR, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-75219-W
ORDER After the Court granted two motions for extension of time, appellant’s brief was due
November 20, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated November
22, 2019 and directed him to file a brief and a motion to extend time to file the same. To date,
no brief or motion has been filed, nor have we had any communication from appellate counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has
not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing,
the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial
court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective
representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tracy Holmes,
Presiding Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; to J. Daniel Oliphant; and to the Dallas County
District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodrick Oneall Taylor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodrick-oneall-taylor-v-state-texapp-2020.