RODRELL M. HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 19-1899·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RODRELL M. HARRIS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D19-1899

[March 11, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312017CF000461A.

Rodrell M. Harris, Ft. Pierce, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Curry v. State, 257 So. 3d 1076, 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (citing State v. Miller, 227 So. 3d 562, 565 (Fla. 2017)).

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RODRELL M. HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

RODRELL M. HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RODRELL M. HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Daryl Miller
227 So. 3d 562 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
THOMAS G. CURRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
257 So. 3d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)