Rodolitz v. Beneficial National Life Insurance

52 A.D.2d 817, 384 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12634

Opinion

Upon restoration of the instant appeal to the calendar, upon request of [818] counsel, the order of Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered December 13, 1974, granting plaintiffs motion for discovery and inspection of certain insurance policies, is unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. We construe the order appealed from, consonant with our prior determination hereon (see Rodolitz v Beneficial Nat. Life Ins. Co., 41 AD2d 707), as requiring the production of policies issued after disclosure in insurance applications of any one or more of the following illnesses: hypotension and hypertension, cerebral-vascular disease and cerebro-vascular insufficiency, prostatis, arteriosclerotic disease, cerebro-vascular spasm and systolic heart murmur. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodolitz v. Beneficial National Life Insurance, 52 A.D.2d 817, 384 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 817 (Rodolitz v. Beneficial National Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodolitz v. Beneficial National Life Insurance
41 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)