Rodolitz Organization v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

219 A.D.2d 703, 631 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9586

This text of 219 A.D.2d 703 (Rodolitz Organization v. Connecticut General Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodolitz Organization v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, 219 A.D.2d 703, 631 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover an overpayment of a prepayment fee on a mortgage note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated June 29, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the fourth cause of action and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment on that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, no ambiguity exists in [704]*704the loan documents (see, W. W. W. Assocs. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly awarded summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri
566 N.E.2d 639 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D.2d 703, 631 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodolitz-organization-v-connecticut-general-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1995.