Rodolfo Humberto Rocha v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 2010
Docket11-10-00312-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rodolfo Humberto Rocha v. State of Texas (Rodolfo Humberto Rocha v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodolfo Humberto Rocha v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Opinion filed December 16, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00312-CR __________

RODOLFO HUMBERTO ROCHA, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-1584-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court convicted Rodolfo Humberto Rocha, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated assault. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years. We dismiss. The clerk’s record reflects that the trial court imposed the sentence in open court on February 22, 2010. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on September 10, 2010, 200 days after the date the sentence was imposed. The notice of appeal is not timely pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. Moreover, we note the trial court’s certificate of right to appeal states that appellant has waived his right to appeal and that he has no right to appeal. On November 16, 2010, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that the notice of appeal appeared to be out of time and directing appellant to respond on or before December 6, 2010, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. There has been no response to our November 16 letter. Absent a timely notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Appellant has not filed a timely notice of appeal or a timely motion for extension of time pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

December 16, 2010 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shute v. State
744 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Rodarte v. State
860 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodolfo Humberto Rocha v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodolfo-humberto-rocha-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2010.