Rodolfo Dominguez v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodolfo Dominguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6190
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 11, 2013·No. 01-12-01148-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01148-CR Style: Rodolfo Dominguez v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 19, 2013 Type of motion: Agreed motion to substitute counsel Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute Colin B. Amann for J. Sidney Crowley as appellant’s counsel of record. We further notify counsel Amann that this substitution will not provide a basis for any further extensions of time, nor will it affect any pending deadlines in this appeal.

Judge's signature:/s/ Harvey Brown  for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 11, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodolfo Dominguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Rodolfo Dominguez v. State (Rodolfo Dominguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.