Rodnez v. State

261 So. 3d 750
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 2019
DocketNo. 3D18-1948
StatusPublished

This text of 261 So. 3d 750 (Rodnez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodnez v. State, 261 So. 3d 750 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla. 2012) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively). See also State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208, 210 (Fla. 2006) (holding that the two-year limitations period for filing a motion to withdraw plea for failure of the trial court to advise a defendant that the plea could result in deportation "commences when the judgment and sentence become final unless the defendant could not, with the exercise of due diligence, have ascertained within the two-year period that he or she was subject to deportation"); Jules v. State, 233 So.3d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Green
944 So. 2d 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Hernandez v. State
124 So. 3d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 So. 3d 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodnez-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.