Rodney Willard Iglesias v. State
This text of Rodney Willard Iglesias v. State (Rodney Willard Iglesias v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00483-CR
RODNEY WILLARD IGLESIAS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Rodney Willard Iglesias entered open pleas of guilty to six
counts of possession of child pornography. After accepting his guilty pleas, the
trial court sentenced Iglesias to six years’ confinement for each count and
ordered that the sentences run concurrently.
Iglesias’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw
as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation
of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. This
court afforded Iglesias the opportunity to file a response on his own behalf, and
he has done so.
As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the
record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is
frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991);
Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only
then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and Iglesias’s pro
se response. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and
without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might support an
appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s
judgment.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 15, 2013
2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodney Willard Iglesias v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-willard-iglesias-v-state-texapp-2013.