Rodney v. Jones

Supreme Court of Delaware

Rodney v. Jones

1 Del. Cas. 12

DecidedApril 15, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 12 (Rodney v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodney v. Jones, 1 Del. Cas. 12 (Del. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

[13]*13Court were divided about a witness. Ld.Raym. 494 cited to show, court divided cannot do a thing nor grant an order. Vide 3 Morg.Ess. 113, 179, Str. 139.

Defendant urged the bond was taken contrary to 2 Body Laws 343 and void, and cited 1 Bl.R. 517, Doug. 242, 2 Salk. 468; and that sole corporations cannot be obligees, 3 Bac.Abr. 696, 4 Co. 65, 1 Bac.Abr. 508.

Verdict for plaintiff for £[-j.¹

Reasons in arrest of judgment post hoc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[13]*13Court were divided about a witness. Ld.Raym. 494 cited to show, court divided cannot do a thing nor grant an order. Vide 3 Morg.Ess. 113, 179, Str. 139.

Defendant urged the bond was taken contrary to 2 Body Laws 343 and void, and cited 1 Bl.R. 517, Doug. 242, 2 Salk. 468; and that sole corporations cannot be obligees, 3 Bac.Abr. 696, 4 Co. 65, 1 Bac.Abr. 508.

Verdict for plaintiff for £[-j.¹

Reasons in arrest of judgment post hoc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. Cas. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-v-jones-del-1793.