Rodney v. City ex rel. Young
This text of 3 Walker 505 (Rodney v. City ex rel. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas, on January 28th, 1884, in the following opinion,
All the facts averred in the affidavit of defense constitute no defense to the action of scire facias. There was no motion to strike off the claim hied. The city ratified the action of whoever hied it, by issuing this sci. fa. on the claim. Still further the affidavit avers that the plaintiff in error is neither the owner nor trustee of the premises against which thé claim is hied. If this be so, he had no right to intervene. The judgment is in rem. only. As there is no personal liability he can have no legal interest in the result.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Walker 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-v-city-ex-rel-young-pa-1883.