Rodney S. Justice v. Kentucky Bar Association

CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 2007
Docket2007 SC 000204
StatusUnknown

This text of Rodney S. Justice v. Kentucky Bar Association (Rodney S. Justice v. Kentucky Bar Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodney S. Justice v. Kentucky Bar Association, (Ky. 2007).

Opinion

TO BE PUBLISHED

uprtum C~Vurf of ~R -' -- 2007-SC-000204-KB

IN SUPREME COURT

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RESPONDENT

OPINION AND ORDER

The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) brought this action against Movant, Rodney

S . Justice, for violations of SCR 3.130-1 .1, SCR 3 .130-1 .3, SCR 3.130-1 .4(a), and SCR

3.130-1 .16(d) . Justice, KBA Member No. 37124, has a last known address of P . O . Box

1895, Ashland, Kentucky, 41105 . For the reasons set forth herein, Justice is

suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty days.

Justice was retained by Phillip Blevins to file an appeal from an unfavorable

unemployment insurance award, and was paid two hundred dollars ($200.00) for this

purpose . Justice filed the appeal request six days late and the appeal was dismissed

as untimely. Thereafter, Justice filed an appeal and was notified that he had ten days to

submit a brief. He failed to do so. A month later, the Unemployment Commission

adopted the original findings denying Blevins benefits .

Still, Justice agreed to appeal the matter to the circuit court. Twenty days after

the deadline to file such an appeal had passed, Blevins called Justice and was informed

that he had not filed the appeal because he "did not want to waste [his] time ." Blevins contacted Justice again some three months later, expressing his dissatisfaction and

requesting the return of his $200.00 retainer. Justice did not return the fee. Blevins

contacted the Kentucky Bar Association and filed a complaint, which resulted in the

present charge, consisting of four counts. After Justice was served with the Bar's

complaint, he returned Blevins' fee.

Count One is that Justice violated SCR 3 .130-1 .1 by failing to competently

represent his client when he did not take immediate action to file an appeal. Count Two

charges that Justice failed to exercise reasonable diligence, in violation of SCR 3 .130

1 .3, when he failed to file Blevins' appeal and to submit a brief with the appeal . He also

violated this provision by failing to appeal the matter to the circuit court. By Count

Three, Justice is charged with a violation of SCR 3.130-1 .4(a) where he failed to keep

Blevins informed of the status of his case, and also misrepresented to Blevins that he

had intended to file an appeal to the circuit court. Finally, Count Four alleges that

Justice violated 3.130-1 .16(d) when he failed to promptly return the unearned fee

following Blevins' request .

Thereafter, Justice admitted that he violated the above stated rules and moved

this Court to suspend him from the practice of law for a period of thirty days . The KBA

did not object to this motion . Upon our initial review of the matter, we concluded that a

thirty-day period of suspension was inadequate, particularly in light of Justice's

significant disciplinary history . On August 24, 2006, this Court suspended Justice from

the practice of law for thirty days for conduct nearly identical to that recited herein . See

KBA v. Justice , 198 S.W.3d 583 (Ky. 2006) . In addition, Justice has been privately

reprimanded by the Inquiry Commission on four prior occasions, each for failing to

exercise reasonable diligence in representing a client and for failing to adequately communicate with clients . For these reasons, we were unable to agree with the KBA

that a thirty-day suspension is the appropriate discipline in this case .

Accordingly, by Order dated May 17, 2007, we informed Justice of the proposed

suspension of sixty days and afforded him the opportunity to object. Justice has not

submitted any such response or otherwise objected to the imposition of a sixty-day

suspension, thus indicating his willingness to accept this disposition . Likewise, the KBA

has no objection to the imposition of a sixty-day suspension .

Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that:

1. Movant, Rodney S. Justice, is hereby suspended from the practice

of law in the Commonwealth for a period of sixty (60) days,

effective from the date of reinstatement in his prior suspension,

which became effective on August 24, 2006.

2. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Justice must pay all costs

associated with these proceedings, said sum being $34 .66, and for

which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this

Opinion and Order.

Lambert, C.J . ; Cunningham, Minton, Noble, Schroder, Scott, JJ ., concur.

Abramson, J., not sitting .

ENTERED : September 20, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Justice
198 S.W.3d 583 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodney S. Justice v. Kentucky Bar Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-s-justice-v-kentucky-bar-association-ky-2007.