Rodney Milum v. State
This text of Rodney Milum v. State (Rodney Milum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Rodney Milum v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-13-01027-CR
Trial court case number: 1347034
Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County
On June 30, 2014, Rodney Milum filed a document in response to the Anders brief filed by his appointed appellate attorney, Melissa Martin. To the extent the document complains of the contents of the Anders brief, we will construe it as appellant’s response and take his arguments into consideration. We also construe the document as a motion for new counsel, as it requests “another appointed lawyer to represent me as it pleases the courts.” The motion is DENIED. There is no right to choice of court-appointed counsel. See King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 566 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Bunton v. Harmon, 827 S.W.2d 945, 949 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: July 8, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodney Milum v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-milum-v-state-texapp-2014.