Rodney Guy Greene v. United States of America Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19096, 1995 WL 321303
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 30, 1995·No. 95-6296·Published

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rodney Guy GREENE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Carolyn V. RICKARDS, Warden,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6296.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995
Decided: May 30, 1995

Rodney Guy Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his petition for mandamus relief, which the court construed as a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Greene v. United States, No. CA-94-644-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodney Guy Greene v. United States of America Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19096, 1995 WL 321303 (4th Cir. 1995).

56 F.3d 61 (Rodney Guy Greene v. United States of America Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.