Rodney D. Watson & Associates, P.C. v. Knight

2013 OK 57, 305 P.3d 1039, 2013 WL 3356982, 2013 Okla. LEXIS 68
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 27, 2013·No. No. 110,142·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

T1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Oka. S.Ct. Rule 1.201.

1 2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775 and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Props., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.3d 789, dispose of the issues in this case.

13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court's dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 27 day of June, 2018.

COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., Concur. WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ., Dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodney D. Watson & Associates, P.C. v. Knight, 2013 OK 57, 305 P.3d 1039, 2013 WL 3356982, 2013 Okla. LEXIS 68 (Okla. 2013).

2013 OK 57 (Rodney D. Watson & Associates, P.C. v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.
2017 OK 81 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
JOHN v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL
2017 OK 81 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)