Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-066-CV
RODNEY D. THORNTON APPELLANT
V.
THOMAS F. DARDEN AND APPELLEES
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
----------
FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered AAppellant=s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 8, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc. (Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.