Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc.
This text of Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc. (Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-066-CV
RODNEY D. THORNTON APPELLANT
V.
THOMAS F. DARDEN AND APPELLEES QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC. ----------
FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT
We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the
court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 8, 2010
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodney D. Thornton v. Thomas F. Darden and Quicksilver Resources Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-d-thornton-v-thomas-f-darden-and-quicksilve-texapp-2010.