Rodney Brand Crawford v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 21, 2013·No. 14-13-00471-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed November 21, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00470-CR NO. 14-13-00471-CR NO. 14-13-00472-CR ____________

RODNEY BRAND CRAWFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1332181, 1332182 & 1332183

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed July 5, 2013. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the presentence investigation report.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before December 12, 2013, containing the presentence investigation report if the report was admitted into evidence and made a part of the court’s file.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodney Brand Crawford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Rodney Brand Crawford v. State (Rodney Brand Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.