Rodney Armor v. Spanish Oaks Apartments
This text of Rodney Armor v. Spanish Oaks Apartments (Rodney Armor v. Spanish Oaks Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00184-CV ___________________________
RODNEY ARMOR, Appellant
V.
SPANISH OAKS APARTMENTS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-00056 1-1
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on August 8, 2024. On August 20, 2024, we notified
appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have
received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: September 19, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodney Armor v. Spanish Oaks Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodney-armor-v-spanish-oaks-apartments-texapp-2024.