Rodnell Herbert Turner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 2020·No. 14-20-00041-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted; Order filed December 3, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00040-CR NO. 14-20-00041-CR ____________

RODNELL HERBERT TURNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1605839 and 1605840

ORDER

In each of these appeals, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. In each case, appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted in both cases. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 337th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in each case in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record in each case to appellant on or before December 18, 2020; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made in each case; and that appellant file his pro se brief in each case with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodnell Herbert Turner v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Rodnell Herbert Turner v. State (Rodnell Herbert Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)