Rodman v. Weller

811 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34830, 1986 WL 18530
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1986·No. 86-3580·Unpublished

Opinion

811 F.2d 607

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Vernon E. RODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gale B. WELLER; Thomas E. Ray; Virgil L. Guiner, Howard E.
Hall; William H. Sterritt, M. Kirby Roberts, Jr., Stephen
E. Weithman, Michael Piacentino, Robert Nemo, John Spiegel,
Richard F. Celeste, Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-3580.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1986.

Before KRUPANSKY, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellant appeals pro se from the district court's orders which dismissed his petition for writ of coram nobis and denied appellant's motion for reconsideration. The case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and the record, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ORDERED that the district court's judgment be affirmed for the reason stated in the district court's opinion. Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Therefore, the motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodman v. Weller, 811 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34830, 1986 WL 18530 (6th Cir. 1986).

811 F.2d 607 (Rodman v. Weller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petz v. Hertzberg
811 F.2d 607 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)