Rodman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodman v. State

935 So. 2d 1285, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14261, 2006 WL 2450358

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2006·No. No. 5D06-1097·Published

Opinion

LAWSON, J.

William Rodman appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court neither attached records to its order that would support a denial, nor stated reasons for the denial in its order, we reverse. See, e.g., Heuton v. State, 790 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWSON, J.

William Rodman appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court neither attached records to its order that would support a denial, nor stated reasons for the denial in its order, we reverse. See, e.g., Heuton v. State, 790 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Rodman v. State, 935 So. 2d 1285, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14261, 2006 WL 2450358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

935 So. 2d 1285 (Rodman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related