Rodman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodman v. State

935 So. 2d 1285, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14261, 2006 WL 2450358

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 25, 2006

DocketNo. 5D06-1097

StatusPublished

This text of 935 So. 2d 1285 (Rodman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodman v. State, 935 So. 2d 1285, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14261, 2006 WL 2450358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

LAWSON, J.

William Rodman appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court neither attached records to its order that would support a denial, nor stated reasons for the denial in its order, we reverse. See, e.g., Heuton v. State, 790 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWSON, J.

William Rodman appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court neither attached records to its order that would support a denial, nor stated reasons for the denial in its order, we reverse. See, e.g., Heuton v. State, 790 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

935 So. 2d 1285, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14261, 2006 WL 2450358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodman-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack