Rodman v. Rodman
This text of 48 So. 3d 1022 (Rodman v. Rodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
This case was originally dismissed as moot. However, injunctions for protection against domestic violence are an exception to the usual rules of mootness because of the collateral legal consequences that flow from such an injunction. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992). Therefore, the appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion dated July 13, 2009 is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place.
On the merits, the injunction for protection against domestic violence is quashed because the petition did not allege, and the testimony at hearing did not establish, that the appellant and the appellee resided in the same household as required by section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 3d 1022, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18566, 2010 WL 4909640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodman-v-rodman-fladistctapp-2010.