Rodman v. Calloway

117 N.C. 13
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

The exceptions to the evidence were waived in this Court and the argument was made mainly on the division of the costs. Each party claimed .title to, and the plaintiff recovered a part of, the land. The jury failed to answer the issue as to the damages on a part of the land, which was left over by the court to be decided hereafter. In this fragmentary condition, we are not disposed to disturb the judgment on the question of costs.

Judgment Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodman v. Calloway, 117 N.C. 13 (N.C. 1895).

117 N.C. 13 (Rodman v. Calloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips
109 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Union Trust Co. v. Southern Sawmills & Lumber Co.
166 F. 193 (Fourth Circuit, 1908)
Rogerson v. Lumber Co.
48 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)