Rodman v. Calloway
117 N.C. 13
Opinion
The exceptions to the evidence were waived in this Court and the argument was made mainly on the division of the costs. Each party claimed .title to, and the plaintiff recovered a part of, the land. The jury failed to answer the issue as to the damages on a part of the land, which was left over by the court to be decided hereafter. In this fragmentary condition, we are not disposed to disturb the judgment on the question of costs.
Judgment Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodman v. Calloway, 117 N.C. 13 (N.C. 1895).
117 N.C. 13 (Rodman v. Calloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips
109 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Union Trust Co. v. Southern Sawmills & Lumber Co.
166 F. 193 (Fourth Circuit, 1908)
Rogerson v. Lumber Co.
48 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)