Rodman v. Boyle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rodman v. Boyle

892 S.W.2d 400, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 1995 WL 57902

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1995·No. No. 65565·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the judgment of the motion court finding her daughter was emancipated. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the judgment of the motion court finding her daughter was emancipated. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Rodman v. Boyle, 892 S.W.2d 400, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 1995 WL 57902 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

892 S.W.2d 400 (Rodman v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.