Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.

185 A.D.2d 670, 587 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9213
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 4
StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 670 (Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp., 185 A.D.2d 670, 587 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment Judgment affirmed without costs.

All concur, except Denman, P. J., who dissents in part and votes to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Skyview Metals v Aluminum Mill Supply Corp. (185 AD2d 668 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J.—Breach of Contract.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skyview Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.
185 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 670, 587 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodman-florida-metals-inc-v-aluminum-mill-supply-corp-nyappdiv-1992.