Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.
185 A.D.2d 670, 587 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9213
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1992·No. Appeal No. 4·Published
Opinion
Judgment Judgment affirmed without costs.
All concur, except Denman, P. J., who dissents in part and votes to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Skyview Metals v Aluminum Mill Supply Corp. (185 AD2d 668 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J.—Breach of Contract.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp., 185 A.D.2d 670, 587 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
185 A.D.2d 670 (Rodman-Florida Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Skyview Metals, Inc. v. Aluminum Mill Supply Corp.
185 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)