RODLIN EDOUARD v. WOOD TAVERN, INC., etc.
This text of RODLIN EDOUARD v. WOOD TAVERN, INC., etc. (RODLIN EDOUARD v. WOOD TAVERN, INC., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 25, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1156 Lower Tribunal No. 17-26761 ________________
Rodlin Edouard, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Wood Tavern, Inc., etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.
Law Offices of Levy & Levy, P.A., and Chad E. Levy (Sunrise), for appellants.
Recalde Law Firm, P.A., and Rafael Recalde and Geremy Klein, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Valenzuela v. Globeground North Am., LLC., 18 So.
3d 17, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (explaining that after the employer provides a
legitimate reason for the termination, the employee “must present
significantly probative evidence on the issue [of pretext] to avoid summary
judgment” and that “conclusory general assertions, however, do not create
factual issues necessary to avoid summary judgment”) (internal citations
and quotations omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RODLIN EDOUARD v. WOOD TAVERN, INC., etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodlin-edouard-v-wood-tavern-inc-etc-fladistctapp-2021.