Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rodino v. Fincham

Rodino v. Fincham

102 A.D.2d 886, 477 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19113
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 886 (Rodino v. Fincham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodino v. Fincham, 102 A.D.2d 886, 477 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dachenhausen, J.), dated January 24,1983, dismissed. (See Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248.) 11 Appeal by defendant Rist from an amended judgment of the same court, dated February 14,1983, dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.20 [f]). 11 Amended judgment of the same court, dated February 14, 1983, affirmed insofar as appealed from by defendant Fincham. (See De Long v County of Erie, 89 AD2d 376, affd 60 NY2d 296.) 11 Respondents are awarded one bill of costs payable by appellant Fincham. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
De Long v. County of Erie
457 N.E.2d 717 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
DeLong v. County of Erie
89 A.D.2d 376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.2d 886, 477 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodino-v-fincham-nyappdiv-1984.