Rodiek v. United States

Supreme Court

Rodiek v. United States

314 U.S. 597, 62 S. Ct. 101

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodiek v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 315 U.S. 783 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1941·No. No. 325·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of [598]*598certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Messrs. Reuben D. Silliman, Sherwood E. Silliman, Russell C. Gay, and Charles H. Lawson for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel, Paul A. Sweeney, Richard H. Demuth, and Harry Leroy Jones for the respondents. The Chief Justice and Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of [598]*598certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Messrs. Reuben D. Silliman, Sherwood E. Silliman, Russell C. Gay, and Charles H. Lawson for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel, Paul A. Sweeney, Richard H. Demuth, and Harry Leroy Jones for the respondents. The Chief Justice and Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Rodiek v. United States, 314 U.S. 597, 62 S. Ct. 101 (1941).

Pincite

314 U.S. 597 (Rodiek v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.