Rodiek v. United States

Supreme Court

Rodiek v. United States

314 U.S. 597, 62 S. Ct. 101

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 13, 1941

DocketNo. 325

StatusPublished

This text of 314 U.S. 597 (Rodiek v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodiek v. United States, 314 U.S. 597, 62 S. Ct. 101 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of [598]*598certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Messrs. Reuben D. Silliman, Sherwood E. Silliman, Russell C. Gay, and Charles H. Lawson for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel, Paul A. Sweeney, Richard H. Demuth, and Harry Leroy Jones for the respondents. The Chief Justice and Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of [598]*598certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Messrs. Reuben D. Silliman, Sherwood E. Silliman, Russell C. Gay, and Charles H. Lawson for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel, Paul A. Sweeney, Richard H. Demuth, and Harry Leroy Jones for the respondents. The Chief Justice and Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 U.S. 597, 62 S. Ct. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodiek-v-united-states-scotus-1941.