Rodi Boat Company v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Company

339 F.2d 259, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 7
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 28, 1964·No. 14853·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record and the briefs of the parties and consideration of their oral arguments convince us that Judge Kirkpatrick committed no error. Consequently, the judgment will be affirmed on his succinct and able opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodi Boat Company v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Company, 339 F.2d 259, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 7 (3d Cir. 1964).

339 F.2d 259 (Rodi Boat Company v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. Colonial Bank & Trust Co.
252 N.E.2d 339 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1969)