Rodgerson v. Lebaron

California Court of Appeal

Rodgerson v. Lebaron

209 P. 216, 58 Cal. App. 665, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 227

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 3, 1922

DocketCiv. No. 4247.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 P. 216 (Rodgerson v. Lebaron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodgerson v. Lebaron, 209 P. 216, 58 Cal. App. 665, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 227 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for $626.90 for injuries resulting from the collision of two automobiles, one driven by the defendant and the other driven by plaintiff’s son. The collision occurred at the intersection of the state highway with Redwood Road, near the town of Hayward, in Alameda County. The plaintiff, with his son driving, was going south on Redwood Road intending to cross the highway. The defendant approached on his left, going west on the highway. The right front wheel of defendant’s ear struck the left rear wheel of plaintiff’s car at a point on the highway about six feet south and to the left of the intersection. The testimony relating to the speed of the cars contains the usual conflict.

The appeal is based upon the ground that the evidence shows that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and that he had the last clear chance to avoid the collision. Upon both of these issues the evidence is conflicting and the court, sitting without a jury, resolved the *666 conflict in favor of plaintiff. Under the circumstances the judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for $626.90 for injuries resulting from the collision of two automobiles, one driven by the defendant and the other driven by plaintiff’s son. The collision occurred at the intersection of the state highway with Redwood Road, near the town of Hayward, in Alameda County. The plaintiff, with his son driving, was going south on Redwood Road intending to cross the highway. The defendant approached on his left, going west on the highway. The right front wheel of defendant’s ear struck the left rear wheel of plaintiff’s car at a point on the highway about six feet south and to the left of the intersection. The testimony relating to the speed of the cars contains the usual conflict.

The appeal is based upon the ground that the evidence shows that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and that he had the last clear chance to avoid the collision. Upon both of these issues the evidence is conflicting and the court, sitting without a jury, resolved the *666 conflict in favor of plaintiff. Under the circumstances the judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 P. 216, 58 Cal. App. 665, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgerson-v-lebaron-calctapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack