Rodgers v. Waste Industries Inc.
This text of 553 F. App'x 332 (Rodgers v. Waste Industries Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[333]*333Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Waste Indus. Inc., No. 4:12-cv-00294-FL, 2018 WL 4460265 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2013). We deny Rodgers’s motion to present newly discovered evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
553 F. App'x 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-waste-industries-inc-ca4-2014.