Rodgers v. Torrez

D. New Mexico

Rodgers v. Torrez

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided March 7, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-00641·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO WESSLEY RODGERS, Plaintiff, V. Case No. 22-CV-00641 KG/JFR RAUL TORREZ, Defendant. JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and the Memorandum Opinion and Order, (Doc. 25), granting summary judgment for Defendant Raul Torrez on the grounds of absolute prosecutorial immunity, all claims against Mr. Torrez are hereby dismissed with prejudice.! IT IS SO ORDERED.

a ED = ES Oe RICT JUDGE

See e.g., David v. Oklahoma, 2019 WL 8108352, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Nov. 22, 2019); Roman Serpik LLC v. Marsee, 2023 WL 4553622, at *4 (W.D. Okla. July 14, 2023) (dismissing claims against defendant entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity with prejudice).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO WESSLEY RODGERS, Plaintiff, V. Case No. 22-CV-00641 KG/JFR RAUL TORREZ, Defendant. JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and the Memorandum Opinion and Order, (Doc. 25), granting summary judgment for Defendant Raul Torrez on the grounds of absolute prosecutorial immunity, all claims against Mr. Torrez are hereby dismissed with prejudice.! IT IS SO ORDERED.

a ED = ES Oe RICT JUDGE

See e.g., David v. Oklahoma, 2019 WL 8108352, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Nov. 22, 2019); Roman Serpik LLC v. Marsee, 2023 WL 4553622, at *4 (W.D. Okla. July 14, 2023) (dismissing claims against defendant entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity with prejudice).

Rodgers v. Torrez, (D.N.M. 2024).

Pincite

Rodgers v. Torrez (Rodgers v. Torrez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.