Rodgers v. State

198 S.W. 574, 82 Tex. Crim. 143, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 300
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodgers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 Tex. Crim. 338
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 1917·No. No. 4691.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for keeping a bawdy house, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $200 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

The complaint and information appear regular. The ease was tried before a jury, who were instructed by the court in a charge not complained of by any bill of exceptions found in the record, though in the motion for a new trial there is complaint of one of its provisions. There is no statement of facts or bills of exception. In this state of the record there is nothing presented which this court can review.

The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. State, 198 S.W. 574, 82 Tex. Crim. 143, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 300 (Tex. 1917).

198 S.W. 574 (Rodgers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.