Rodgers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodgers v. State

559 So. 2d 392, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1990 WL 40353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 392 (Rodgers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodgers v. State, 559 So. 2d 392, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1990 WL 40353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is settled that “all inferences on a motion to dismiss are to be resolved against the defendant.” State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981, 982 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). That being so, the trial court was entirely correct in denying the motion to dismiss, whether based on the contents of the motion and response thereto, or the trial court’s viewing of the defendant’s actions on the videotape, or both.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is settled that “all inferences on a motion to dismiss are to be resolved against the defendant.” State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981, 982 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). That being so, the trial court was entirely correct in denying the motion to dismiss, whether based on the contents of the motion and response thereto, or the trial court’s viewing of the defendant’s actions on the videotape, or both.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 392, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1990 WL 40353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack