Rodgers v. State

193 So. 560, 29 Ala. App. 154, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 118
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 30, 1940
Docket8 Div. 892.
StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 560 (Rodgers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers v. State, 193 So. 560, 29 Ala. App. 154, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

Motion is made to strike the bill of exceptions. The trial was had and judgment entered September 16, 1938. Motion for a new trial was overruled December 19, 1938; bill of exceptions was filed with the clerk of the circuit court on January 25, 1939. The bill of exceptions was not presented to and signed by the judges trying the case until May 19, 1939. The record affirmatively shows that the approval and signing of the bill of exceptions does not comply with the statute. Code 1923, § 6433.

The motion of the Attorney General must .be, and is, granted.

There being no bill of exceptions, and no error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 560, 29 Ala. App. 154, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-state-alactapp-1940.