Rodgers v. Shearin

576 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2014·No. No. 14-6283·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights complaint for failure to comply with the court’s earlier order to particularize and amend the complaint, and denying Rodgers’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Shearin, No. 1:13-cv-02902-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2014 & Feb. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. Shearin, 576 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2014).

576 F. App'x 216 (Rodgers v. Shearin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related