Rodgers v. Riley, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2001)
This text of Rodgers v. Riley, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2001) (Rodgers v. Riley, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mandams will not lie to enforce a private right against a private person as Rodgers is attempting here.1 We also find that Rodgers has failed to comply with R.C.
Furthermore, he has failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a) which requires that original actions be supported by an affidavit specifying the details of the claim.2
Accordingly, we dismiss this action. Rodgers to pay costs.
Petition Dismissed.
ANN DYKE, J., and FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodgers v. Riley, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2001), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-riley-unpublished-decision-8-9-2001-ohioctapp-2001.