Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co.

74 S.E. 899, 11 Ga. App. 133, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 288
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1912·No. 4026·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1: Assignment of error upon a judgment overruling a demurrer to a plea can not properly be made in a motion for a new trial. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544.

2. The evidence was conflicting and authorized the verdict in the defendant’s favor. There was no error in the admission of evidence. In the light of the entire charge, the extracts therefrom upon which error is assigned are free from substantial error. No sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment refusing a new trial.

Jiidgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co., 74 S.E. 899, 11 Ga. App. 133, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

74 S.E. 899 (Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.
90 S.E. 1037 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)