Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co.

Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co.

74 S.E. 899, 11 Ga. App. 133, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 288
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 7, 1912
Docket4026
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 899 (Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co., 74 S.E. 899, 11 Ga. App. 133, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1: Assignment of error upon a judgment overruling a demurrer to a plea can not properly be made in a motion for a new trial. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544.

2. The evidence was conflicting and authorized the verdict in the defendant’s favor. There was no error in the admission of evidence. In the light of the entire charge, the extracts therefrom upon which error is assigned are free from substantial error. No sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment refusing a new trial.

Jiidgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.
90 S.E. 1037 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 899, 11 Ga. App. 133, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-hill-williamson-co-gactapp-1912.