Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION

313 S.W.3d 710
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 2010
DocketED 93497
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 S.W.3d 710 (Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION, 313 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tork Rodgers (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding him ineligible for unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varty v. Varty
313 S.W.3d 710 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 S.W.3d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-gainey-transportation-moctapp-2010.