Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION

313 S.W.3d 710
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 93497·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tork Rodgers (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding him ineligible for unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION, 313 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

313 S.W.3d 710 (Rodgers v. GAINEY TRANSPORTATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Varty v. Varty
313 S.W.3d 710 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)