Rodgers v. Baker

22 S.E. 585, 96 Ga. 800
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 8, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A homestead which has been regularly set apart, can neither be waived nor renounced by the head of the family so as to authorize a levy upon, and sale of, the property so set apart, under an execution issued upon a judgment rendered against him; and if, pending the existence of the homestead, such property be levied upon under such an execution and sold, the sale is void, and a purchaser thereat acquires no title, even though the judgment upon which the execution issued is based upon a promissory note containing a stipulation in which the head of the family does solemnly “waive and renounce the benefit of the homestead.

Judgment affirmed.

Robert L. Rodgers, for plaintiff'. Dorsey, Brewster & Howell, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers v. Baker, 22 S.E. 585, 96 Ga. 800 (Ga. 1895).

22 S.E. 585 (Rodgers v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. Gilliland
19 Ga. App. 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)