Rodgers v. Angelone
This text of Rodgers v. Angelone (Rodgers v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7448
TROY WAYNE RODGERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia De- partment of Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-99-1309-AM)
Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Wayne Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Troy Wayne Rodgers seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rodgers v.
Angelone, No. CA-99-1309-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 12, 2000; entered
Sept. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodgers v. Angelone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-angelone-ca4-2001.