Rodgers v. Allied Holdings, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodgers v. Allied Holdings, Inc.

2 A.D.3d 1435, 768 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14438

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 1435 (Rodgers v. Allied Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodgers v. Allied Holdings, Inc., 2 A.D.3d 1435, 768 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Doyle, J.), entered December 20, 2002, which denied the motions of defendants Earl M. Schunk and Duane D. Warriner for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance of action No. 8 signed by the attorneys for the parties on November 6, 2003 and filed in the Erie County Clerk’s Office on November 18, 2003,

It is hereby ordered that said appeals from the order insofar as they concern action No. 8 be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Doyle, J.), entered December 20, 2002, which denied the motions of defendants Earl M. Schunk and Duane D. Warriner for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance of action No. 8 signed by the attorneys for the parties on November 6, 2003 and filed in the Erie County Clerk’s Office on November 18, 2003,

It is hereby ordered that said appeals from the order insofar as they concern action No. 8 be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 1435, 768 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-allied-holdings-inc-nyappdiv-2003.