Rodgers, Teretha v. HBC dba Saks Fifth Avenue

2020 TN WC 49
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 28, 2020
Docket2019-06-1998
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 49 (Rodgers, Teretha v. HBC dba Saks Fifth Avenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers, Teretha v. HBC dba Saks Fifth Avenue, 2020 TN WC 49 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

FILED May 28, 2020 11:37 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

TERETHA RODGERS, ) Docket No. 2019-06-1998 Employee, ) v. ) HBC d/b/a SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, ) State File No. 100976-2019 Employer, ) And ) SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker CORP., ) Carrier. ) ____________________________________________________________________

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER (DECISION ON THE RECORD) ____________________________________________________________________

This claim came before the Court on Ms. Rodgers’s request for expedited hearing on the record. Ms. Rodgers requested temporary disability and medical benefits, including reimbursement of medical expenses, for a meniscal tear in her right knee. For the reasons below, the Court denies Ms. Rodgers’s request.

Claim History

The Court derived these facts from file documentation. Ms. Rodgers worked for HBC as a warehouse order picker, which involved climbing ladders and kneeling. On April 5, 2019, Ms. Rodgers complained to her supervisor of right-leg pain and left early to obtain emergency care.

The Court does not have the emergency room records but does have records of Ms. Rodgers’s treatment with Dr. Blake Garside. Initially, Dr. Garside suggested Ms. Rodgers believed her injury had occurred gradually without an identifiable cause when he wrote, “She has been experiencing pain in the right knee now for 2 months . . . She does not recall any specific injury.” Dr. Garside neither noted any potential causes nor suggested a primary cause. Ultimately, he surgically repaired Ms. Rodgers’s lateral meniscus tear.

1 HBC asserted Ms. Rodgers deprived it of the opportunity to provide medical care or temporary disability benefits by failing to report a work injury until six months after leaving work early for emergency treatment. According to affidavits from two of her supervisors, Ms. Rodgers said she could not work because of an injury and a surgery but never said that work caused her injury. Also, in her application to HBC for a leave of absence, Ms. Rodgers wrote that she needed leave for her “personal serious health condition.”

Ms. Rodgers’s written statements convey uncertainty over the injury’s development. In her petition, Ms. Rodgers characterized her injury as developing over three weeks from climbing and kneeling at work. In her affidavit, however, she suggested her injury happened on April 5 while climbing ladders at work.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

As an initial matter, HBC objected to including the majority of documents in the claim file on hearsay grounds. These included: (1) NCCI proof of coverage inquiry; Cigna Claim Details; a billing statement from Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and billing statements from other medical providers. The Court agrees that these items are hearsay. Additionally, none of these items are properly authenticated by a record’s custodian, so none fall under any hearsay exceptions found in Tennessee Rule of Evidence 901.

Turning to the substance of Ms. Rodgers’s claim, in order to prevail at an expedited hearing, she must present sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2019). HBC argued Ms. Rodgers is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits because she did not present sufficient evidence of medical causation and did not provide notice of a work injury. The Court denies Ms. Rodgers’s requested benefits for lack of medical proof but declines to address the notice defense.

The Court declines to decide the notice issue for two reasons. First, the Court holds that Ms. Rodgers failed to present sufficient evidence of medical causation. Second, the documentation does not clarify whether Ms. Rodgers alleged a gradual or an acute injury. For these reasons, the Court cannot determine whether Ms. Rodgers should have provided notice under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-201(a)(1) or section 50-6-201(b).

The notice issue aside, the main failing of Ms. Rodgers’s claim concerns expert medical proof. To prevail at a final hearing, Ms. Rodgers must prove she suffered a work injury by presenting “expert medical proof that the alleged injury is causally related to the employment when the case is not ‘obvious, simple [or] routine.’” Berdnik v. Fairfield

2 Glade Com’ty Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *10-11(may 18, 2017). While lay testimony is probative, it is insufficient to prove causation without expert medical evidence. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *12 (Aug. 18, 2015) (“Employee’s lay testimony in this case, without corroborative expert testimony, did not constitute adequate evidence of medical causation.”).

Here, Ms. Rodgers failed to prove causation through expert medical evidence. In fact, based on the leave request she subnmitted to HBC, even Ms. Rodgers seemed unsure of the cause of her injury. Likewise, her surgeon, Dr. Garside, noted that Ms. Rodgers suffered knee pain for two months but stated “no specific injury.” Because she conveyed no specific injury, Dr. Garside did not relate the cause of her condition to work. Without expert medical evidence on causation, the Court cannot find that Ms. Rodgers would likely prove her injury arose primarily out of her employment. Therefore, the Court holds Ms. Rodgers is not likely to prevail at a final hearing.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Ms. Rodgers’s request for benefits at this time.

2. The Court sets this claim for a scheduling hearing on July 6, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call (615) 741-2113 or toll-free at (855) 874- 0474 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED May 28, 2020.

___________________________________ Joshua Davis Baker, Judge Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3 APPENDIX

1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing and Teresa Rodgers’s Affidavit 4. Affidavit of Nicki Wilcox 5. Affidavit of Charles Lohn 6. Affidavit of Bridget Hollis 7. Medical Records 8. Leave of Absence Request Form 9. Letter

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on May 28, 2020.

Name Certified Email Service sent to: Mail Teretha Rodgers, X tarodgers5510@gmail.com Employee Catheryne Grant, X catherynelgrant@feeneymurray.com Employer’s Attorney jessica@feeneymurray.com

/S/ Penny Shrum ____________________________________________ Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims Wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

4 Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-teretha-v-hbc-dba-saks-fifth-avenue-tennworkcompcl-2020.